NP> Ahem, can you please be a bit more specific? If this is the case than NP> this is related to the packaging of ptx/cor (whatever it might be). Yes. Must be. NP> Info would have to check *every* node in *every* info file, ie reading NP> all info files, checking all node texts, and probably finding 20 NP> occurences of ptx in these files. Which one should be shown? Naw... just as Debian has only one ptx command on PATH, there should only be one on "INFOPATH": All I know is that if a command is on the default PATH and MANPATH, etc. then it should also be on the INFOPATH, if there is such a thing. Manly when I hit "C-h i m" in emacs, some commands are right there, and some need a second level of looking up. It is because some package maintainers put them on the top level, and some don't. NP> If the ptx/cor package installes an info file ptx.info, then you will NP> get with "info ptx" the right stuff. If it is hidden in some node of the NP> info document named differently, then you cannot accept much better? Can't it still get written into a link from the top level info directory or something?
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
