On 2024-06-21 09:51:39 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 21 June 2024 at 05:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 21 June 2024 at 10:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > | | Control: tags -1 moreinfo > | | > | | On 2024-05-27 12:01:45 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | | > > | | > Package: release.debian.org > | | > Severity: normal > | | > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > | | > Usertags: transition > | | > > | | > GNU GSL 2.8 was released a few days ago, and I uploaded a new version to > | | > experimental was has now cleared NEW. > | | > > | | > I checked my email folder, and the last time this happened (gsl 2.7, > early > | | > 2021) we attempted an automatic transition but some things got in the > way it > | | > seems. Help from Graham (CC'ed) was invaluable then, > | | > > | | > I am easy either way: a formal or automatic transition works for me, so > | | > please advise as to what you preferred course of action is. The package > has a > | | > fair number of reverse dependencies but rebuilds "should" work cleanly. > | | > | | Did you perform test builds of the reverse dependencies? > | > | Mo, how wow I trigger this? > > Ok, now with more coffee and after an early morning bike ride: > > "No, how would I trigger this?" Happy to help but will need a hint.
https://wiki.debian.org/MassRebuilds has a few pointers, but essentially one of the following: * You do them yourself with a tool like ratt or others. * Contact Lucas do to it for you on AWS. * http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/ * https://debusine.debian.net/ - but not sure if it is ready to do run the test builds. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
