-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 07:37 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> That quite definitely is the long term solution. It has one downside:
> Backporting to bookworm-backports and earlier will result in a broken
> package that is not (re)started during package installation and
> upgrades. Now lightdm is not a package with a long history of backports
> so this trade-off may well be a good one and a backport also can revert
> this change (if one remembers to do so).
> 
> So this mainly is a question of how you want to deal with backports.

Yes, to be honest I'm unlikely to backport 1.32 to Bookworm, so I guess I'll
go with the move.

Thanks for the reply!

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmZ130cACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtlYwgAovVHigiLsFB1Yrq3gHj3SZ703/qA/7HTPyrgsZg9K4UnsPsQ3VlCb04B
zd8Zi9iMPE1v+hBXnYHmRrKn02tIvgVidTvas+WY56tcXq2k1obyv61xk7E84Cnx
4pE4labdMdsgQbF2Uqqzuk0m4OU1Rghq0hbxQp0j0Kt1GR6MeiTWGt4qaUM2m7Ju
YW4qcl3bglZwHt7lv5Nxmy9I7Tjg2Gq0yskVSu61nut47wjXucxb890Ru7CIUHkM
V1taRlrbhqIk4P+YTM1HauH3ABs/TGW6hRijjHtQDgy9qTGjboBzpV+fk5kEyS2l
JFbUucItmNZ5WcSOt3HghkVBpwd2bg==
=rxY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to