Hi Mathieu, * Mathieu Mirmont <m...@parad0x.org> [240618 09:40]: > Hi Chris, > > Sorry for being slow to respond, I'm quite busy at the moment. Would > you mind removing this NMI for the time being so I can think about > what would be best?
I've rescheduled it to DELAYED/14 to provide more time. > I don't suppose there is much urgency here. This is one of many loose ends needing tying up for getting UsrMerge done for trixie and having forky not being in a limbo-state again. While individual packages could finish very late, given the overall amount of things we have to keep track of, the remaining time until the (estimated date of the) trixie transition freeze is not that generous. Please help us out and let us close as many topics as we can. > As Lorenzo noted, this package is really only meaningful in a runit > based system. I understand that the intention is to standardise within > Debian, but I also want to consider the consequences for downstream > distros. I think in Debian we are now down to two or three source packages. I would imagine downstream distros need to deal with this already, one way or another. Let me know if the 14 days are not enough. Best, Chris
