Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01/06/2024 01:37, Patrick Franz wrote:
Hej,
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2024, 09:41:11 CEST schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 16/05/2024 23:34, Patrick Franz wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team,
we would like to request a transition for Qt 6 from 6.4.2 to 6.6.2.
To prepare for this transition, we tried to build as many reverse
dependencies as possible. We encountered some FTBFS, but those
failures have either been fixed since or patches are available to
make the packages build with Qt 6.6.
How many failures are we talking about? Can you make those bugs block
this one? Since this transition needs to go into testing in lockstep,
we can't start the transition until this is in a good shape.
There are 5 failures left in Debian to take care of from what I know:
* qtcreator: We split a package into 2 and qtcreator needs to build-
depend on both. This cannot be fixed until Qt 6.6 is in unstable. Since
the package is maintained in our team, I can fix it myself.
* qcoro: Build results in symbol errors and can only be fixed once it is
built against 6.6. The package is maintained in our team, so we'll take
care of that.
* pyotherside: FTBFS against Qt >= 6.5, but a patch is available. I
filed a bug against the package and set it as blocking this transition.
* dolphin-emu: FTBFS indepedently of the Qt version, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064753. The package
has already been removed from testing, so that should not be a problem.
* gpsbabel: We encountered test failures when we did the test build. It
is likely that this was due to build environment as I could not find any
problems at all for this package when building against Qt 6.6.
Sounds like we're in good shape. You can go ahead.
Cheers,
Emilio
