>Josselin Mouette wrote: >> No. Both epiphany and galeon depend on libxul, not firefox. Something >> else must have brought firefox. > >The desktop task pulls in firefox. > >> As galeon is more compliant with the GNOME HIG than firefox, it makes >> sense to give it a higher priority than firefox. The problem here is >> that firefox shouldn't have been installed. > >Yes it should; it's the browser a great many users >expect to have installed with their desktop.
That means users will get 2 graphical browsers installed by default... I think that, while firefox is the most popular gnu/linux browser, those who will want it, will be able to install it easily, and remove epiphany. I think epiphany vs firefox as default should be discussed in terms of features and quality. The biggest disadvantage of epiphany is the amount of extensions there are for firefox, and the strange way bookmarks work. The biggest advantage is the integration in Gnome. For example, in epiphany, I click a RSS feed button and it imediately is subscribed in liferea. Until some time ago there was no such thing for firefox (and the plugin I tried some days ago didn't for me). But it's your call, as I'm also ambivalent on which should be the default, mostly because it's hard for newbie users to imediately _know_ they can go to a terminal and do "aptitude install firefox", let alone use aptitude to browse the packages and find it (aptitude needs a X frontend). OH MY ... http://www.geocities.com/jobezone/index.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
