On Sun, 02 Jun 2024 18:46:22 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Sunday, 2 June 2024 02:53:49 CEST you wrote: > > On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:45:03 +0000, Francesco Ballarin wrote: > > > is it possible to add loong64 and riscv64 to the archs listed in > > > /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependency.pm > > > ? > > > > Maybe we should use (in lib/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependency.pm) > > /usr/share/dpkg/ostable or Dpkg::Arch's get_valid_arches() instead of > > hardcoding architectures? > > > > What do you think, Dominique? > > Well, ostable file does not mention loong64 arch.
Right. There's also /usr/share/dpkg/cputable, maybe that's a better fit? > And get_valid_arches returns quite a lot of architectures, just for loong64 > (and for all others): […] > Are these values suitable for the arch restriction of a dependency ? Not sure … Or maybe it's easier to just add the two new ones instead of inventing more complexity :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
