Control: reopen -1 On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:15:02 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote:
Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:44:54 +0200 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: systemd > Version: 256~rc3-4 > Severity: normal> > > Please do not not ship conflicting configuration for /run/lock > > /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/debian.conf:d /run/lock 1777 root root - -> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/legacy.conf:d /run/lock 0755 root root -> > triggering unnecessary warnings.This is needed to apply debian-specific changes, just ignore it, it's harmless
Besides the obvious warning message, shipping conflicting tmpfiles configuration snippets also has the problem, that depending on which file you override, one or the other becomes active.
Say you create a /etc/tmpfiles.d/debian.conf, then the configuration in legacy.conf becomes active and vise versa.
This is highly confusing.tmpfiles entries are not easily overridable, as the mechanism is per file and not per entry.
So, either legacy.conf gets split up so individual entries can be overridden or your patch legacy.conf.
The current approach is not sufficient.Btw, please don't close bug reports without CCing the bug submitter. That's rude.
Michael
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
