On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:36:00 +0000 Detlef Eppers <epp...@posteo.de> wrote:
> That said: naming is important and naming is hard, but three years > have passed, and it is my impression that this is getting somewhat > out of proportion. +1 i have been building my own gpgme packages for the last 5+ years because of all the indecision & nitpicking. If it helps, here is an updated branch: https://salsa.debian.org/twolife/gpgme/-/commits/gpgmejson details: - i put the gpgme-json binary in a new 'gpgme-bin' package and not 'libgpgme-dev' as this is not a dev/debug/test utilitie - the browser manifests are shipped in the same package, a 5 lines json file doesn't justify the overhead of splitting it in another package - thanks to Sascha Wilde for the manpage i stoled in the previous MR i have the feeling i'm sending this email to /dev/null :'( graybeards blocking progress because "this is my sacred garden that young fools will not taint" is unfortunately pretty common in debian land :'(
