On 2024-05-21 at 11:39:25 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > I noticed that your package uses the so-called "weak team maintainer" model, > [...] > Is this a deliberate decision or merely an artifact of some packaging helper > tool [...]
Thanks for looking into this. It is a deliberate decision: this package is somewhat quirky and in the past I've had to say no to suggestions that would have fixed some issue, but caused problems elsewhere, so I'd prefer to keep the weak team maintainer model (as long as it is in a wide-scope team). Of course the typical team-wide changes are much welcome, but those usually don't trigger a new upload. This should be the only package I maintain that uses the weak team maintainer model, all of the other ones should be already using the team as the Maintainer (if they don't, *that* is an artifact of something, and if I'll notice it I'll fix it) -- Elena ``of Valhalla''
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
