Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 15:03, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 May 2024 09:08:41 -0400 Scott Kitterman > <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 14:10:44 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-CC: nil...@debian.org, r...@debian.org, vasu...@debian.org > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As per > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070768 with > > > the agreement of the maintainers I have NMUed bpfcc/0.29.1+ds-1.1 > to > > > remove ppc64el, as it has been failing to build for months and has > kept > > > the package out of testing. > > > Please remove the ppc64el binary packages. > > > > This is going to be a little more complicated than that. > > > > Checking reverse dependencies... > > # Broken Depends: > > bpfcc: python3-bpfcc > > bpftrace: bpftrace > > golang-github-iovisor-gobpf: golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-dev > > oci-seccomp-bpf-hook: oci-seccomp-bpf-hook > > > > For the arch: all packages like python3-bpfcc, there's nothing to > do. For the > > arch specific packages, bpftrace and oci-seccomp-bpf-hook, they will > have to be > > removed first. > > > > bpftrace should be just another rm bug. Once bpfcc is removed, it > should no > > longer build on ppc64el. oci-seccomp-bpf-hook on the other hand > seems to be > > more complicated. It does not appear that oci-seccomp-bpf-hook > build-depends > > on libbpfcc-dev, so even if it's ppc64el binary is removed, it would > just > > reappear after the next upload. > > I think for oci-seccomp-bpf-hook it's a transitive build dep, oci- > seccomp-bpf-hook build deps on golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-dev which > depends on libbpfcc-dev so it gets pulled in. So I think two RM bugs, > one each for these two source packages, should be enough. I'll file > them shortly.
Actually golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-dev is arch: all, so only one should be needed, no? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071275 Please correct me if I'm wrong
