On Sat, Jun 03, 2006, Mark Nipper wrote: > As a follow-up to my last report, here's the rather trivial > patch to fix the problem. I don't know about the incorrect path making > the package unusable, but it almost certainly breaks policy and since > the postinst and postrm scripts refer to the correct path, let's at > least make things consistent.
OK, the patch was not the problem. But I agree with the maintainer scripts problem. Sorry for the trouble. And thanks for the follow-up. -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette
