Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Having a printer spool in /tmp doesn't sound all that clever, so here's a > > patch to change it to what seems to be the upstream recommendation. > > > Do we need some samba-common.postinst magic to force this upgrade, or > > should we just leave it? > > Where is the value in creating this directory at all, if you're just > going to create it with the same perms as /tmp anyway?
I would say: "avoid the risk of filling the root partition" for setups where users do not have a separate /tmp partition. Another argument would be being closer to upstream recommendations without breaking the FHS compatibility.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
