Hello, On Wed 27 Mar 2024 at 11:40pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Rob, can you review the implementation in d/rules for Xiyue's patch to >> this bug, please? I'm not sure it's the straightforward way to do it. >> >> Xiyue, I think it would make sense to use emacs-common (<< 1:29.3+2-2), >> for the relationships. > > Ah indeed, I should update the versions after the Emacs 29.3 upload, > though I think you meant "1:29.3+1-2". Also, as we are just moving > files from emacs-common to emacs-pgtk, breaks/replaces is only needed > from emacs-pgtk to emacs-common but no the other way around, so I > dropped the breaks on emacs-pgtk from emacs-common. > > I have updated the patch accordingly and attached here. PTAL. Thanks. > (BTW, I'm always curious about the "+1" part of the version number. I > would expect something like "+dfsg" or "+ds" as we are dropping some > of the non-DFSG conformant files, but why "+1"? :) It's just in case the DFSG split is done incorrectly and another attempt is required -- given how complex it is. -- Sean Whitton
