On 2024-03-13 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler:
>> On 2024-03-10 Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
>>> Andreas Metzler:
>> [...]
>>>> supporting build-profiles like nodoc with dh_install seems to cumbersome.

>>> Any reason for not using dh_installdocs, which does `nodoc` out of the box?

>> Because for this specific case I need to handle files outside of
>> /usr/share/doc/$package.

> Ok, thanks for clarifying.

> The use of substitution is not intended as a filtering mechanism. The go-to
> solution for having filtering beyond debhelper's built-in is `dh-exec` which
> has architecture and build-profile filtering.

Hello,

would you mind documenting that? I accept that is your choice to make
that design but I ended up spending quite some time on debugging things
that afaict (from reading debhelper(7) should have worked. Could you please
untag this wontfix and document it?

> I understand that this might not be what you want. However, this is the
> feature set provided. If you really want to do all this logic in
> debian/rules, then you can simply do a `install foo bar` directly in the
> d/rules (or a `dh_install foo bar`).

"dh_install foo bar" was my "second try" in the bugreport (more details there)
but that broke dh_missing in the --build=any case.

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to