Control: severity -1 serious Hi Ryan,
This bug is also reproducible on the armel and armhf release archs as a result of the time_t transition, so bumping this to serious. On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 06:04:45PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote: > Would you be willing to test build the attached patch on hppa? I've tested > it on amd64 with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration appended. > From fa0b704371762bdc479a5d8dc6a0a6df4ec3a52e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ryan Tandy <r...@nardis.ca> > Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:58:15 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix implicit declaration of kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx > > --- > debian/patches/series | 1 + > debian/patches/smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration > > diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series > index a8d57cb99c..7381d0a06b 100644 > --- a/debian/patches/series > +++ b/debian/patches/series > @@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ add-tlscacert-option-to-ldap-conf > fix-build-top-mk > switch-to-lt_dlopenadvise-to-get-RTLD_GLOBAL-set.diff > set-maintainer-name > +smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration > diff --git a/debian/patches/smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration > b/debian/patches/smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..a704086286 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/patches/smbk5pwd-implicit-declaration > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +Description: Fix implicit declaration of kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx > +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1065633 > +--- a/contrib/slapd-modules/smbk5pwd/smbk5pwd.c > ++++ b/contrib/slapd-modules/smbk5pwd/smbk5pwd.c > +@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ > + #include <krb5.h> > + #include <kadm5/admin.h> > + #include <hdb.h> > ++#include <kadm5/private.h> > + > + #ifndef HDB_INTERFACE_VERSION > + #define HDB_MASTER_KEY_SET master_key_set > -- > 2.39.2 This does fix the build failure. I was about to push such a change to the repo and do a maintainer upload, since I've never been removed from the uploaders field after all these years ;) Do you want me to do this, or would you be able to do it tonight? Getting openldap to build is a priority wrt rebootstrapping 32-bit archs for time_t. BTW there's also a reproducible test failure that I'm seeing on armhf in both Debian and Ubuntu which is new; I'm not sure if it's related to time_t, or if it affects other archs? >>>>> Starting test046-dds for mdb... running defines.sh Running slapadd to build slapd database... Running slapindex to index slapd database... WARNING! Running as root! There's a fair chance slapd will fail to start. Check file permissions! Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Testing slapd searching... Creating a dynamic entry... ldapadd failed (255)! ../../../tests/scripts/test046-dds: 93: kill: No such process >>>>> test046-dds failed for mdb after 2 seconds (exit 255) make[4]: *** [Makefile:303: mdb-mod] Error 255 In Ubuntu we disabled the tests on armhf to not hold up the bootstrap. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
