On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:50:16AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Steve,
> The time_t transition was only for 32 bits arch support, right? It needs > nothing in 64 bits arch. > If that's the case, then you can remove Ceph from your list. The > Experimental package of Ceph, already lost support for 32 bits, and I asked > all reverse dependency maintainers to remove Ceph support on 32 bits arch > (this includes various packages like Samba, Qemu, etc.). > When I'll have time to work on Ceph again, then I'll upload Ceph 18.2.x from > Experimental, and that will mean no 32 bits support for Ceph in Debian > anymore. > Can you please confirm that I'm right above, so that on my next upload of > Ceph 18.2.x to unstable, I can close this bug? Yes, if you are dropping 32-bit support then you can close the bug then. In the short term, this is still on the list of packages to NMU for transition. Even if it will be dropped on armhf before release, we don't want to risk problems with ABI skew of the existing reverse-dependencies clogging up buildability or migratability so it's safest to just make sure we rebuild with the new name. But once 32-bit is dropped you should feel free to ignore the rename (except perhaps that you should then add Provides/Breaks/Replaces back the other direction for t64). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
