Upon review, it's clear that 'itcl3' is not a library name (the library is
named libitcl3.4), and that there are no reverse-depends of this package in
the archive using the library.  Therefore I propose to not change the itcl3
package name for this transition, and leave the package as-is.  Closing this
bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to