On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 01:10:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Craig,

> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 07:17:08AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >   Looks like you missed one:

> > dh_installdocs -plibsnmp-perl -ptkmib -plibsnmp-base -plibsnmp40
> > dh_installdocs: error: Requested unknown package libsnmp40 via
> > -p/--package, expected one of: snmpd snmptrapd snmp libsnmp-base
> > libsnmp40t64 libnetsnmptrapd40t64 libsnmp-dev libsnmp-perl tkmib
> > dh_installdocs: error: unknown option or error during option parsing; 
> > aborting

> Uhm.  I'm unclear how this could be, since we do test builds of the packages
> (dpkg-buildpackage -b) before filing any bugs.  I'll dig into this.

Got it.  Sorry, newly introduced bug in the uploader script.  Fixing up the
patch now.

> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 03:54, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Source: net-snmp
> > > Version: 5.9.4+dfsg-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: patch pending sid trixie
> > > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> > > Usertags: time-t
> > >
> > > NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
> > >
> > > Dear maintainer,
> > >
> > > As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
> > > architectures in 2038 and beyond
> > > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
> > > net-snmp as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
> > > either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
> > > analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
> > > side we assume is affected).
> > >
> > > To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their
> > > reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to
> > > have a library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the
> > > runtime library package.
> > >
> > > Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
> > > to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
> > > important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
> > > together in time.  Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for net-snmp
> > > which will initially be uploaded to experimental if possible, then to
> > > unstable after packages have cleared binary NEW.
> > >
> > > Please find the patch for this NMU attached.
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP.  
> > > Although
> > > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
> > > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if
> > > information
> > > becomes available that your package should not be included in the
> > > transition,
> > > there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- System Information:
> > > Debian Release: trixie/sid
> > >   APT prefers unstable
> > >   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
> > > 'experimental')
> > > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> > >
> > > Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> > > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
> > > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
> > > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> > > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> > >
> 
> -- 
> Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
> slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to