Hi again, On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:46:35PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Control: tags -1 = moreinfo
> Re: Steve Langasek > > If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although > > this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a > > period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if > > information > > becomes available that your package should not be included in the > > transition, > > there is time for us to amend the planned uploads. > I just found out that libpg-query is included because it was thought > to be "uninstallable": > https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-01T09:53:00/logs/libpg-query-dev/apt.log > [2024-01-20T03:02:49+00:00] apt-get install libpg-query-dev libprotobuf-c-dev > postgresql-server-dev-15 abi-compliance-checker > E: Unable to locate package postgresql-server-dev-15 > I think that's bogus, the package has not been depending on PG15 for > some time. > Please exclude it from the NMUs. > Also, why did I not get a bug for that? I understand that you can't > look at 1500 packages individually, but checking the 40-something on the > https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-01T09:53:00/summary/results_uninstallable.txt > list would surely have been possible? This uninstallability got addressed in a refreshed run, and libpg-query-dev now shows as its ABI affected by time_t. So unfortunately it does appear this package needs to be included in the transition. https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-09T15%3A12%3A00/compat_reports/libpg-query-dev/lfs_to_time_t/compat_report.html (and fwiw even if this is a false positive, it also shows up as having an ABI that's sensitive to LFS: https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-09T15%3A12%3A00/compat_reports/libpg-query-dev/base_to_lfs/compat_report.html) postgresql-server-dev-16 also shows up as impacted by LFS but the output is confusing, mentioning only redefinitions of constants from perl and python headers, why should those have disappeared based on defining LFS flags? The changes are suspicious enough that I'm not prepared to conclusively declare it a false positive. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
