On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:53:07PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello Florian, > > For the purpose of documentation only: > The Public Patent Foundation is filling for reexamination of this patent, see > <http://www.pubpat.org/Chen_672_Reexam_Filed.htm>.
The Public Patent Foundation has won the first round: <http://www.pubpat.org/Chen672Rejected.htm> "The Patent Office has agreed with our conclusion that it would have never granted Forgent Networks' '672 patent had it been aware of the prior art that we uncovered and submitted to them," said Dan Ravicher, PUBPAT's Executive Director. "Making matters worse here is that this new prior art was known by those who filed the application that led to the '672 patent, but none of them told the Patent Office about it, despite their duty to do so." Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
