On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 14:27, Steinar H. Gunderson <se...@debian.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:44:25AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Doing so, thanks. I could probably see if Debian has a porterbox where I
> can
> > reproduce this, but I'm not too optimistic (and I don't have a lot of
> extra
> > time to dedicate to this right now, unfortunately).
>
> There's a single Marvell porterbox, but it runs armhf (not armel) and a
> 4.9.0
> kernel, so no, there's no simple way for me to reproduce this.
>

Thanks for checking this.

I explored if building a suitable QEMU VM is possible, but it appears to be
a deadlock:

- People appear to be using the versatile boards [1] to emulate armel on
QEMU.
- Debian stopped supporting versatile boards in 2016 [2].

There's also a project automatically creating QEMU images for different
Debian-supported architectures [3], but armel is marked "currently not
working; I have no idea about how to make it work" :-D

I also gave it a shot reproducing on a RPi Zero 2, but it's either too fast
(even with cpulimit), or the issue is architecture-specific and does not
manifest on ARMv7.

Perhaps the last hope would lie on the maintainers of the armel installers,
who *may* have a setup (physical or virtual) for testing.

Best regards,
Manolis

[1] https://qemu.readthedocs.io/en/master/system/arm/versatile.html
[2]
https://linux.debian.ports.arm.narkive.com/LZmJKpyJ/arm-ports-bof-armel-in-buster#post6
[3] https://people.debian.org/~gio/dqib/


> /* Steinar */
> --
> Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
>

Reply via email to