Hallo! Du (Paul Gevers) hast geschrieben:
> In bug 1058696 [1] I requested for the bts to start sending the e-mails for
> the release.debian.org pseudo package to a different place than
> debian-release@l.d.o. Don suggested an alternative: have the list procmail
> rules filter out the bts reports. Would you be willing to do that (and do
> you think it makes sense)?
>
> Paul
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1058696
>
> On 15-12-2023 06:02, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2023, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Does it make sense to you to use the tracker as the canonical point
> > > where e-mail is send, it's already send there anyways?
> >
> > I'm OK with sending the e-mail wherever y'all would like it. I'm also OK
> > if debian-rele...@lists.debian.org is kept as the "maintainer" but bug
> > email for the release.debian.org pseudopackage is discarded by
> > lists.debian.org. [listmaster can do this with a procmail rule on
> > lists.debian.org.]
> >
> > The advantage of the procmail rule is that someone looking to get in
> > contact with the release team won't accidentally send their e-mail to a
> > mailbox which no one ever will look at.
> >
> > But at the end of the day, it's up to y'all.
Can you point me to one or two of the unwanted mails currently going
to debian-release?
However: if we implement this, i'd consider this as a workaround as
mails that should not be distributed, should not be sent out in the
first place.
Yours,
Cord, Debian Listmaster of the day
--
https://lists.debian.org
