Control: found -1 fai-client/6.0.5 * Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de> [231117 23:50]: > >>>>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:54:29 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler > >>>>> <z...@debian.org> said: > > > Now a problem arises, when: > > - I use a basefile tar.gz, made with an old systemd (say, it uses > > testing as of today) > > - During baseupdate, systemd gets updated and moves its file (say, I'm > > actually installing unstable) > Mmm, I do not know if it's possible to catch this. > Using an old system which is then updated may always cause strange > problems.
I came at it from another PoV: is this still needed? > Does this problem also arises when you use a basefile from unstable? > This is the main question I have. No, because then there is no systemd-sysv upgrade happening as part of updatebase. But then updatebase is kinda supposed to handle exactly such things, no? > fai-client 5.11? I do not know this version. I guess it's some > other version. I can't say what the version we saw this originally really is, but it reproduces on 6.0.5. Best, Chris
