On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 09:17, Craig Small <csm...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 23:45, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Now that Bookworm has shipped, what about finally finishing this and >> getting rid of this debianism? There is really no reason to delay it >> any longer at this point. Thank you! > > Hi Luca, > I'll need the assistance of the sysvinit-utils maintainers (CC'ed) as well, > as pidof will be moving from that package. Doing this will also bring Debian > (and Ubuntu) in line with most other distributions out there that use pidof > from procps. > > I'm, not going to cover sysvinit-utils moving out of Essential as it doesn't > matter for procps if it is or is not. > > So I'm looking at https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition > and assuming procps is 2:4.0.4-2 and sysvinit-utils is 3.08-3 > > I would create procps 2:4.0.4-3 with pidof and Breaks: sysvinit-utils (<< > 3.0.8-4) and Replaces: sysvinit-utils (<< 3.0.8-4) > sysvinit-utils maintainers create 3.08-4 without pidof and have Breaks: > procps (<< 2:4.0.4-3) > > If everyone is in agreement with this, I'll update procps this week.
Thank you, LGTM.
