Quoting Peter Green (2023-11-07 11:59:32) > On 02/11/2023 05:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > >>> That's wonderful news. > >>> > >>> I am happy to update rust-rustls, as soon as possible. Seems to only > >>> blocker is an transitive dependency on rust-rcgen needing an update as > >>> well: See bug#1055132. > > The package rust-sct needs relinking as well. > Thanks for preparing the updates, I think we are now ready to move > on this in unstable, afaict the following steps are needed. > > 1. re-upload the new untrusted, ring, rcgen and sct packages to unstable. > 2. re-upload the new rustls-webpki and rustls packages to unstable > 3. re-upload the remaining rust team packages that depend on ring to unstable. > 4. upload a version of rust-rustls-native-certs with updated dev-dependencies > (less critical, but needed to avoid rust-rustls-native-certs becoming rc > buggy and may also be needed for testing migration) > > To minimise the time things are broken in unstable are you ok if I > perform step 2 (and maybe also step 4) as a NMU?
Looks good to me. Yes, I am fine with you zero-day NMUing here. Thanks! I am not convinced that step 4 is really needed, but that is not important to me - i.e. if you consider it important then feel free to zero-day NMU for that as well - then I guess I can simply revert to relax dependencies when I get around to revisiting the packages later. So you only need to elaborate on your reasoning for step 4 if you think I might cause damage by later relaxing. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
