On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:20:08AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > Included is a manpage documenting backtrace(); it is not presently > > ready for inclusion; some issues remain. > > > I'm sending it for review > > and for help.. > > Justin, I probably need you to do as much as possible. > Have you read the other documentation, and integrated relevant > ideas into the page? No worries; I submitted to bug such as to forward it to Sefan and make it otherwise available for review.
> My helping time is limited. Happily, Stefan is willing to help. > Converse with him, and keep me in the loop. > > > You can view it with something like "nroff -man backtrace.3 |less". > > It was a while beore I realised that "man -l" is simpler... For me, man -l doesn't have any underline or bold.. > > The most important thing that needs fixing is figuring out why the > > backtrace doesn't work :) I don't know how to get the function names > > to resolve from their addresses. Apparently -rdynamic does this, but > > it doesn't work for me... > > It works for me: It works for me too now that you point out that static makes the backtrace symbols unavailable.. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
