What semantics are you thinking for handling upgrades? This does not appear to be a new zpool "feature", so we may want to support loading such a pool on an earlier version of our zfs packaging. How does this sound?
- migrate the property if it exists (but do not remove the old, root filesystem one) - use the pool-level property if there's a conflict, but throw a warning if there's a discrepancy between the two - suggest people remove the old property if they don't need backwards compatibility in NEWS - in several version, start warning if the filesystem one is still around - several versions after that, stop even checking for the old property Antonio
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
