Hello Helge, > I reviewed your patch and it looks fine. So I intend to integrate it > and prepare a new release.
> However, I have two questions before I can prepare the release: > 1. What is the license of your patch? Is GPL 3+ fine? > 2. Usually, I use "vendor" for hw->hw_cpuinfo, however, it looks like > to me there is only one vendor? > In this case I think using "familiy" is fine. In the end, it is up > to you porters to that architecture. I'm very sorry for the late reply, I missed this email. For the questions: > 1. What is the license of your patch? Is GPL 3+ fine? Yes, I think use GPL 3+ is fine . > 2. Usually, I use "vendor" for hw->hw_cpuinfo, however, it looks like > to me there is only one vendor? Yes , there is only one vendor . and I also think using "familiy" is fine . thanks , JiaLing
