On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 03:19:36PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > In trying to reduce another bug, I got the following:
> > $ { printf '%s\n' 'UBCT1 local_datas' ';; a' 'abc.def. 3600 in txt testupa'
> > ';; b'; } | sudo socat - UNIX-CONNECT:/run/unbound.ctl
> > error parsing local-data at line 1 position 4 ';; a': Syntax error, could
> > not parse the RR
> Is there a reason you're not reporting this dirctly uptream?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#:~:text=Don't%20file%20bugs%20upstream,
bestieAnd, more succinctly: > AFAICT the > (few) Debian patches we have don't touch any of this code and 1.18.0 is the > latest upstream release so there should be no reason to burden the Debian > maintainers here. The Debian maintainers' purpose is precisely to know if they broke something or if they hadn't and to tell me to report something upstream (or to do so themselves, or to fix it themselves, or to apply a patch, or do whatever is approprate for their favourite software they alone know the precise details of). Indeed, some would say this is most of the value-add of a distribution. Phrasing this as "reporting a bug in debian to the appropriate debian maintainers burdens them greatly" is baffling. If this mail were "We don't seem to patch this in Debian. > This also applies to your #1051818. I'd suggest submitting the bugs here > https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/new/choose > or the unbound-users ML if you prefer not to use GH > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users > --Daniel " then that'd be reasonable. But come on, don't berate users for doing the right (and hard-fought-for) thing. наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
