Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 22:16 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > FreeType 2.12.1 shipped with experimental COLRv1 support enabled. > This was > unintentional, as the implementation shipped in this release was > incomplete and > incompatible with the final COLRv1 API. > > Upstream's intention was to enable COLRv1 support in FreeType 2.13.0. > > Applications attempting to use the partial COLRv1 API in FreeType > 2.12.1 will > get unexpected (and incorrect) results. >
Do we know if any applications shipped in bookworm attempt to use this partial API? If so, do we know how they'll handle the change? Regards, Aam
