Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead.
>> Thank you.
> Which one is that?  I can't find any indication in the package what
> replaced it.

The binary package fonts-noto-unhinted is currently empty because it
contained only fonts lacking hinting, and currently all fonts provided
from same source package are available with hinting.

So I would turn the question around: Do xml2rfc require fonts without
hinting, or does it require certain specific fonts which formerly
existed only without hinting?


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply via email to