Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead. >> Thank you. > Which one is that? I can't find any indication in the package what > replaced it.
The binary package fonts-noto-unhinted is currently empty because it contained only fonts lacking hinting, and currently all fonts provided from same source package are available with hinting. So I would turn the question around: Do xml2rfc require fonts without hinting, or does it require certain specific fonts which formerly existed only without hinting? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature