> > I have no problem with that. After all, it's FOSS, and I can modify the > > files on my systems. I just thought my proposal would be useful to > > others as well (besides aligning with the documentation and eliminating > > one unnecessary cause of runtime errors -- oh, and trivial to implement). > > I have taken my time to reply to your bug, and explain to you why it's not > trivial to change so please do not tell me it's trivial. It's there for > a reason and the reason doesn't suddenly go away if you chose to ignore > it.
The change you intend would not be trivial. My statements clearly refer to *my* proposal, not yours, and measured by the length of the patch file I have provided and that it affects a single file only I stand by my claim that that change would be trivial. I fail to understand what the "it" is you claim to be there for a reason and what the reason is you claim I have ignored. I'm sorry to have placed an excessive temporal burden on you; I'll try to avoid that in the future by not reporting bugs any more. Lottermoser -- Martin Lottermoser martin.lottermo...@htp-tel.de Greifswaldstrasse 28 38124 Braunschweig http://home.htp-tel.de/lottermose2 Germany Telephone: +49 531 6802747
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
