On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:15:33AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:45:35PM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:09:22AM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
>> tag 367618 + patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Please find attached my patch which moves libexpect5.43.so back into the
>> expect package.
>>
>> expect-dev Depends on expect, so the shared object will available to
>> link with (re: bug #367325).
>
> Well the real fix would be to package the library following Debian
> policy...
Well yes, of course. My patch was an attempt as a small patch to resolve
the (symptoms of) the reported bug, not a reworking of the whole
package. The maintainer can decide how they want to handle it (I do not
intend to NMU with this patch atm).
Hello Paul,
The comment was really intended for the maintainer.
I took the liberty to upload a NMU with your patch because this bug
caused other packages to FTBFS.
Bill, I appreciate you taking over this package, and for your reasonable
attitude in another forum. I hope you make DPL next year, and sorry I
played hardball with you in this last election.
Ted
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
Eukleia: Ted Walther
Address: 5690 Pioneer Ave, Burnaby, BC V5H2X6 (Canada)
Contact: 604-430-4973
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
