On 2023-07-25, Dave Jones wrote: > Heinrich Schuchardt and I were just having a look at this area for the > ubuntu packaging, specifically whether to include > u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin in the u-boot-sunxi build (and whether to poke > upstream to update the README that gets included by u-boot-sunxi.docs), > and ran across this bug while seeing if anything had been considered in > this area up in Debian. > > Is this still on the cards post-bookworm?
Thanks for bringing this up! Admittedly, I lost track of where this issue stands, as some of it was merged but obviously not all of it. It could perhaps benefit from refreshed patches and possibly a merge request via salsa.debian.org. I have a few relevent systems I could test with. At least with a pinebook, I vaguely recall that it failed to boot using this method, but it has been a long time since I tried and I apparently neglected to mention the details... things may have changed since. I am also a bit inclined to adding u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin rather than replacing all the other parts, as there are some use-cases (e.g. an image capable of booting both sunxi and rockchip systems at different offsets) where the individual parts are still needed. live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
