This makes sense -- thanks for the clarification!

On 21.07.23 02:47, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Bruce Allen wrote:
Dear Bjarni,

thanks very much for the corrections/patches to the man pages.

I reviewed the diff and it looks good.  Something I was wondering: why are
you inserting the zero width characters '\&' in various places?  I thought
that there were only needed to avoid an input sequence being misinterpreted
as a control character.  But in many places where you have inserted it, I
did not realize that this was a possibility.

   '\&' is, with the current layout of the source text, unnecessary,
but the position of the words can later change.
   So using '\&' is just a measure in advance.

   My explanation was:

Protect a period (.) or a apostrophe (') with '\&' from becoming a
control character, if it could end up at the start of a line
(by splitting the line into more lines).

   Can you suggest a better explanation?

   Maybe I should add after the sentence in parentheses:

"by reflowing, reorganising, reformatting the source text."

Extreme case: each word in a textual line is put in a separate line.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Allen, Adjunct Professor of Physics
Leonard E. Parker Center for Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics
Physics Department
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
3135 N Maryland Ave
Milwaukee, 53211 USA

Tel: +1 414-229-4474
Fax: +1 414-229-5589
bal...@uwm.edu

Reply via email to