On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:18:27AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Christian Kastner <c...@debian.org> writes: > > On 2023-06-12 17:01, Sune Stolborg Vuorela wrote: > >> Any chance you can give Andreas a go ahead to push a newer Gnupg2 to at > >> least > >> experimental, or preferably unstable ? > > > > I, too, would appreciate a newer version. It turns out that in versions > > prior to 2.3, the 'kdf-setup' option with cards does not work [1]. At > > least, that was the case with both Yubikeys and Nitrokeys here on my end. > > How about uploading ametzler's branch to experimental, as a start? It > is good time after the bookworm release. I offer to help maintain GnuPG > in Debian. Perhaps uploading it to mentors would be a first step, any > objections? > > There are some new features in GnuPG 2.4.x that I rely on, having to > build it locally is a pain.
+1 for an upload of 2.4 to experimental; I'm quite interested in playing with the support for TPM backed keys. I haven't seen dkg or Eric weigh in on this thread, but they've had a few months to object and given gnupg lives under the debian/ tree in salsa I'd take that as an indication that an upload to experimental would be acceptable. J. -- I am afraid of the dark.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
