The next might sound as if it were a silly excuse, but the Web interface of my
e-mail server has an issue right now (a few minutes before, everything worked
just fine); I can only write an “answer to all” (but not construct any e-mails
to new folks). This may or may not repair itself later; I don't know. Thus,
could I kindly ask you to please send this to pstri...@tug.org (just a copy and
paste; if you wish to, Cc also Herbert Voss and Rolf Niepraschk; their e-mails
are in pst-node.sty): “ Dear PSTricks maintainers, Might we kindly draw your
attention to http://bugs.debian.org/1019236 ? My stock TeX Live version
2022.20230122-3 with texlive-pstricks 2022.20230122-4 is set up to produce A4
output by default. Reproduce: 1) Create mwe.tex containing
\documentclass{article} \pagestyle{empty} \usepackage{pst-node}% letter with
this, A4 without this. pstricks or pst-all would do as well. Checked with
pst-node.sty version 2012/09/18 v1.01. \begin{document} test \end{document} 2)
Run latex mwe dvipdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY mwe.dvi pdfinfo mwe.pdf 3) Observe
that the resulting PDF has letter format. If we don't use pst-node, pstricks,
or pst-all, we get A4 as usual. Simply using a drawing package and not
specifying anything about the paper (such as the class options a4paper or
letterpaper) should not incur a deviation from the system-default paper format.
Gratefully! ”
06.07.2023, 20:46, Preuße, Hilmar < mailto:hill...@web.de hill...@web.de >
On 06.07.2023 12:24, Peter Mueller wrote: Hi, > Don't know about unstable (I
cannot risk an upgrade now), but as for > the texlive-pstricks 2022.20230122-4
containing pst-node.sty > 2012/09/18 v1.01, the bug still exists. > Do you have
the time to discuss this with the upstream author. I don't have. Sorry! Hilmar
-- sigfault
