Control: block -1 by 1040492 Quoting Jeremy Bícha (2023-07-06 19:26:14) > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 12:48 PM Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Quoting Jeremy Bícha (2023-07-06 18:30:42) > > > Would you like to share why you need that feature? > > > > Would you like to share why the feature was patched out? > > > > My reason for needing the feature is not a secret. I am however > > reluctant to write elaborate bugreport for packages that seem to not > > be elaborately packaged. > > > > Concretely, and as also mentioned in this bugreport, lack of DEP-3 > > patch headers that would help hint at the reason for the existence of a > > patch. > > > > DEP-3 patch headers are documented here: > > https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/ > > > > So let's trade: Please first share why it was patched out. ;-) > > Well, this is also not a secret. It's in debian/changelog: > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1441750/accepted-rust-cipher-044-2-source-into-unstable/
Thanks. Added blocking hint accordingly. I am working on packaging Safenet (bug#1008016) which transitively requires cbc, which in turn requires cipher with feature block-padding. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature