On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:07:14AM -0400, pryzbyj wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:49:15PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > Justin, > > > > > > > Any suggestions about other pages whose SEE ALSO should mention this > > > > > page? > > > > Not really ... I'll have to think about it. > > > I'm including patches to add a SEE ALSO, and also to fix and tweak the > > > page based on some new\-found understanding .. > > > > > > If you tell me where to get your most recent copy, then I'll provide a > > > patch against that. > > > > +only the first character of \fIresponse\fP is considered significant. > > > +Responses matching \fBm/^[Yy]/i\fP are always accepted as affirmative > > > +(in any locale), and those matching > > > +\fBm/^[Nn]/i\fP are always accepted as negative. > > > > This is more detail than I think is really required to explain > > the point. You already say that just the first character is > > significant. The additional RE isn't needed. > But this happens for any locale; it is a behaviour to document, not an > implementation. Does there exist a [latin] language where _("no") doesn't begin with 'n', so I can test that this is true not just for "yes" ("oui")?
For that matter, is there a language in which _("yes") and _("no") begin with the same character? For that matter, is there a language in which _("yes") and _("no") begin with the same byte? BTW, locale.7.gz already referenced rpmatch. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]