On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:07:14AM -0400, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:49:15PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > Justin,
> > 
> > > > > Any suggestions about other pages whose SEE ALSO should mention this
> > > > > page?
> > > > Not really ... I'll have to think about it.
> > > I'm including patches to add a SEE ALSO, and also to fix and tweak the
> > > page based on some new\-found understanding ..
> > > 
> > > If you tell me where to get your most recent copy, then I'll provide a
> > > patch against that.
> 
> > > +only the first character of \fIresponse\fP is considered significant.
> > > +Responses matching \fBm/^[Yy]/i\fP are always accepted as affirmative
> > > +(in any locale), and those matching
> > > +\fBm/^[Nn]/i\fP are always accepted as negative.
> > 
> > This is more detail than I think is really required to explain 
> > the point.  You already say that just the first character is 
> > significant.  The additional RE isn't needed.
> But this happens for any locale; it is a behaviour to document, not an
> implementation.
Does there exist a [latin] language where _("no") doesn't begin with
'n', so I can test that this is true not just for "yes" ("oui")?

For that matter, is there a language in which _("yes") and _("no")
begin with the same character?

For that matter, is there a language in which _("yes") and _("no")
begin with the same byte?

BTW, locale.7.gz already referenced rpmatch.

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to