On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > My take would be to mark it as unsupported after the trixie development cycle > has started (this flags awareness, but has no impact on stable releases) > and then revisit the support situation before the trixie freeze (Kea might be > a full replacment by then or maybe it turns out the patch support is ensured > despite upstream's EOL) > Hi Moritz,
Now that bookworm is out and (AFAICT) that the trixie development cycle has started, are able to go ahead with marking isc-dhcp as unsupported? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez
