Hi Andreas,

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Salvatore,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:12:57PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libeconf
> > Version: 0.5.1+dfsg1-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security upstream
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team 
> > <t...@security.debian.org>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following vulnerabilities were published for libeconf.
> [...]
> 
> Thanks for notifying me about this. I've prepared libeconf 0.5.2
> packages in git and just uploaded towards unstable.
> 
> IMHO I think uploading the same to stable would be fine (even though
> there's one "unrelated" change in new upstream version so maybe not
> strictly a security-only release), because libeconf has no reverse
> dependencies in the debian archive yet! The risk of regression should
> thus be almost non-existant.
> 
> If by chance you have the SRM dance in muscle memory, please feel free
> to take over getting 0.5.2 into stable! It's been a while for me and
> honestly since libeconf is still unused it's very low prio for me.

I do agree that this is low enough that it might be fixed in a point
release and does not require a security-update but it is not
particularly urgent.

Thanks for having it fixed for unstable (and so towards trixie). 

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to