On Tue, 23 May 2023, László Böszörményi wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:45 PM Albrecht Dreß <albrecht.dr...@posteo.de> wrote:
I added the attached patch file to the Debian patches and re-build the package,
which now processes SVG files as expected, so this seems to be a fix
Sorry, I had totally forgotten about this issue.
I did not see the final generated product attached to the issue. On
the system I am looking at, there is a
/etc/ghostscript/fontmap.d/10gsfonts.conf file which must be similar
in nature to the /etc/ghostscript/fontmap.d/10fonts-urw-base35.conf
which Debian is using.
Rather than modify type-ghostscript.mgk.in, it is likely better to
create a new file "type-urw-base35.mgk" and add it to the list of
files specifically for Debian. Since the font installation paths are
fixed for Debian then just store hard-coded paths in the mgk file
since there is no reason to configure or search for them.
I recall that Ghostscript (i.e. "Artifex Software, Inc.") has disowned
the original set of font files which was distributed with it so
perhaps these URW fonts are not accurately described as Ghostscript
fonts.
GraphicsMagick should of course support Fontconfig. I am not sure
what the impact of doing so (e.g. run-time performance) is. I have
not studied it at all.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Public Key, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt
