Hi, On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 17:38, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi all! > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 05:21:45PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge Qt installs lots of really not-required headers > > in > > it's private stuff. If you ask them it's for the sake of simplicity, as you > > are > > not supposed to use private headers... > > > > The reason we export those private headers is because we build Qt by > > submodules instead of a big huuuge build including webengine et all, and Qt > > submodules do have internal private dependencies. > > > > So yes, it is a valid bug, but I am afraid that it will be too hard to get > > that right. Non the less I really appreciate you filing this bug report, it > > is > > a good thing to have it around. > > > > @Dmitry: I would mark this as wontfix, what do you think? > > Well, if adding just one small dependency will make Steve's script happy, > then I don't mind doing it. But if we are talking about a dozen of extra > dependencies, I would rather not do it. Or maybe they should be Recommends or > Suggests.
Oh, I actually had my mind mostly on the dependencies that are unsolvable on Debian. But yes, I agree with those. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer https://perezmeyer.com.ar/
