On 2023-04-23 18:44, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 01:39:51PM +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
On 2023-04-23 13:04, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:37:44PM +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
On 2023-04-21 19:00, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:33:00PM +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
Package: retroarch-assets
Version: 1.3.6+git20160731+dfsg1-2
Open the attached Debian_11_Stable.png screenshot. As you can see, these
icons are missing:
...
This issue has been fixed in:
Debian 11 Testing (see attached screenshot)
Package: retroarch
Version: 1.14.0+dfsg-1
Package: retroarch-assets
Version: 1.7.6+git20221024+dfsg-2
Yes, that's expected. The retroarch-assets package in bullseye was
extremely dated and this has been corrected for bookworm.
Thanks. This bug is marked as solved, why aren't these two PNG files going
to be added to the stable retroarch-assets package?
Debian generally doesn't update packages in the stable release unless
there's a security issue or a serious functionality issue. While it
might be a minor fix here it's also primarily a cosmetic issue.
Thanks. Personally, I think the lack of these icons in this stable package
release make it look unstable, because it's on the main interface. Don't you
agree?
I don't agree this is a critical enough bug to roll out to stable (bullseye),
even if we weren't so close to releasing bookworm. retroarch in bullseye
is not in great shape, but I believe I have resolved that for bookworm.
J.
I respect your decision, J.
I filed this issue: https://github.com/libretro/RetroArch/issues/15210
-- Should I close it or merge it to Debian?
I'll close it if the "Update Assets" entry has been removed from the
retroarch package in Debian.
