Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 12:14 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote: > after upload of libvncserver: 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1 our users spotted > a > regression in performance of x11vnc. The solutions for the reporting > users were: > > (1) downgrade to libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2 > (2) rebuild x11vnc against libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1 > > Option (2) is IMHO the way to go, thus this binNMU request for x11vnc > in > Debian bullseye. > > The ABI-break patch in libvncserver is this: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/libvncserver/-/blob/debian/bullseye/updates/debian/patches/0003-rfb-increase-update-buf-size.patch
Given that this is apparently an ABI break, and libvncserver has several other reverse (build-)dependencies in stable, how confident are you that x11vnc is the only affected package? Regards, Adam
