On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 08:53:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:47:47 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Source: poetry
> > > Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: FTBFS
> > > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> > > User: lu...@debian.org
> > > Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > > on amd64.
> > 
> > It builds fine on my local machine. I built more than 10 times on 
> > barriere.d.o
> > and it worked fine.
> > 
> > I was able to reproduce the issue once on my local machine, of many,
> > many re-builds though but unfortunately that is not enough (for me) to
> > reliably repro/root-cause this.
> > 
> > Would you please consider building this again? If it still fails, then
> > maybe it is a random issue or reproducible on some specific systems. I'm
> > downgrading the severity to important for now, I hope that is fine.
> 
> I can still reproduce it, and it fails every time for me.
> 
> However, it does not fail with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=1 (while it
> fails every time with the default (parallel=8 on my system)). So it
> looks like a race condition in the tests?

I tried with this option as well, but it still works OK for me, not sure
what is off. It even works on salsa CI[1] so not sure of a way to
properly repro it.

@Santiago, sorry about pulling you into a random thread.
If you have some time, could you please see if this is
reproducible at your end? And if so, could you, like the previous time, give me
access to a machine where this might be a bit more reliably
reproducible?

[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry/-/pipelines/488531

-- 
Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to