On 2/14/23 05:25, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 09:26:03PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
If the XScreenSaver configuration file is included as a part of the core xscreensaver package itself, as a file that is simply unpacked, the following situation will result:
If the configuration file is split out into its own separate xscreensaver-config package

This is totally orthogonal to a solution to the bug reporter's issue.
Splitting the xscreensaver package up and shipping the same files in
different sub-packages and adding alternatives or other metapackage
complications will do nothing to solve their problem.

Your motivation for all that extra complexity is also orthogonal to
Debian: you're talking about an enhancement for Ubuntu. As it stands,
you're talking about making Debian worse to make Ubuntu better, and
that's a hard sell.

I don't really understand the purpose of this message - the bug report is closed and a solution was already uploaded.

--
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu Developer
https://github.com/ArrayBolt3
https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3
@arraybolt3:lubuntu.me on Matrix, arraybolt3 on irc.libera.chat

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x6169B9B4248C0464.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to