El 29/1/23 a las 22:29, Axel Beckert escribió:
This is actually more than that, because the build-dependency
theoretically would not be necessary as mount is not really used at
build or test time.
But there's one test checking the environment for a typical "make,
make test, make install" workflow to abort if not all required
run-time dependencies can be found. This of course makes little sense
for building packages.
But this also hinted that a run-time dependency on mount was (also)
missing — for the same reason.
An interesting case, indeed.
This is now the third time that a bug discovered by building with only
truly essential packages helped the maintainer to discover missing
binary dependencies.
Thanks for sharing!
