On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:20:17AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2023-01-30): >> Fine. I'd be *tempted* to maybe define the default to "always", to be >> 100% clear and (maybe?) more consistent to my OCD. At some point I >> expect we're likely to end up with a case statement in hw-detect, >> after all. > >I'd rather not name and define something if we don't need to. What if we >need or want to distinguish between loading files from the installation >images and/or from external storage, etc. later on? People might already >have written their preseed or whatever, and complain we're changing the >meaning behind that setting. > >Things would be much different if we were actually asking a question >(e.g. in expert mode). > > >(And as you know from our meeting, I totally agree with the “case >possibility” in the future. But I'd rather wait until we have new, >reasonable use cases that we want to implement, before deciding on new >names and semantics.)
That's fair. +1 -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed?
